Understandably, yacht owners and operators take pride in their vessels, and invest a lot of time and money to ensure that they are well cared for while they are underway, or being hosted by a marina.  Marinas that cater to the mega-yacht market understand the value of providing high-end concierge services that cater to the needs of yacht owners and quality support facilities for the crew.  However, when reviewing the services, costs, and value information normally used to determine marina selection, it is important to include security as an essential factor for consideration.

Not a day goes by without some reminder of the number and varied types of threats to which yacht owners and their vessel operations may be exposed.  Piracy continues to present a challenge to vessels off the coast of Somalia, and has expanded into the Indian Ocean.  Pirate attacks against vessels of all types are now common along the Horn of Africa, Asia, Central/South American and the Caribbean.  Mega-yachts were typically not affected by piracy and maritime security issues, but that has also changed over the past few years.  Pirates and criminals increasingly view yachts as easier, more viable, and potentially more lucrative targets than cargo vessels, especially those that choose to transit high-risk areas without benefit of a protective convoy or security team. 

In addition, criminal threats such as theft, vandalism, and assaults against yacht crews are showing signs of increasing worldwide.  Many of the companies that offer insurance for luxury vessels and marinas are paying increased attention to owner/operator implementation of maritime security standards and practices as a factor in determining the premium costs.  As a result, many yacht owners are taking control of onboard security by installing their own security systems and bringing professional security teams onboard to effectively implement security policies and procedures, especially if the vessel itinerary is expected to transit high risk areas or ports-of-call.   

Security is usually not a concern or even considered when docked at the marina, especially in those areas that are considered “safe”.  However, that is often the most vulnerable time for a vessel, and its crew.  Many mega-yacht marinas do not have security as a priority for investment of resources, but more of an additional cost to be avoided…especially during the current economic times.  Some marinas are doing the minimum to comply with their interpretation of security regulations in order to stay in business.  Sadly, these facilities may not stay current with evolving standards for the security of recreational vessels in a dynamic regulatory environment. 

Not all marinas are equal in the services they provide to mega-yacht owners, captains and crews.  It doesn’t matter where in the yachting world you go, whether Europe, the United States, Asia or the Caribbean, evaluating the level of the marina’s functional compliance with security should always be a priority.  Yacht owners and operators have an obligation that all reasonable “due diligence” measures are taken to ensure that the vessel, crew, and passengers will be safe and secure…at the marina and all ports-of-call on every itinerary.  I have had the opportunity to travel to facilities around the world and have found some well run and secure marinas, but have also found some very poorly run facilities. 

There are a number of things a mega-yacht captain can do to evaluate the security standards and services of marinas, anywhere they may go worldwide.  This checklist provides a starting point for determining what facility may offer the best operational and financial value for their vessel when it comes to security:

  1. Determine if the facility has had any security related incidents in the past 24 months?  This would include any theft of property, damage to vessels/property, vandalism or other security related problems. 

This may also be important information to provide to insurance claims adjustors in the event an unfortunate incident does occur at the marina you selected to berth your yacht.    Unfortunately, many times the marina operators are reluctant to provide this information or, the information provided is not always accurate.  However you can still find out the facility’s most immediate history through the following sources: 

  1. Check with your agent to see if they have used the facility for other clients and their dealings with the facility in the past.
  2. Talk to other mega-yacht captains you trust to see if they have used the facility in the past and their experience.
  3. Use the internet!  There is a plethora of information there on just about every topic.  There are also a number of websites used by sailors, cruisers, and yacht crews to share information on facilities.  These can be great resources, but do take some time to read and research.
  4. Read past issues of the local newspaper.  Most local newspapers are archived online and are easily searchable.  However, this can be very time consuming as well.
  5. Hire a reputable, experienced maritime security company to gather threat and vulnerability information on the target marina and its host community.  There are only a few companies that provide this type of service and are knowledgeable about the security requirements specific to the yachting community, but they are well worth the time and expense.  They can usually provide detailed reports on a certain facility along with information on the current political climate of the country and surrounding region.  Some even provide point to point service and will monitor a particular area while you are in the facility.

2.      Does the facility maintain adequate lighting from dusk till dawn? 

Look for a facility that has good lighting around the marina buildings and grounds, and that projects a cone of lamination over the waterside approaches to the berthing areas sufficient to see anyone approaching the yacht from that vector.  Lighting or lack of lighting can make a big difference for adequately securing a marine facility.

3.            Are there effective fencing, barriers, and measures for access control and accountability at the  entrances to the marina’s docks, piers, and slips? 

While the marina owner/operator wants the property to be esthetically pleasing, it is also important that access to the piers and slips be effectively controlled.  The better facilities will have decorative fencing that prevents access along with access cards for guests and visitors.  This type of control provides a much safer environment for vessels. Also remember to never dock in a slip along the seawall or fencing.  This is one of the most vulnerable spots in the facility for unauthorized intrusion.  Make sure to ask the marina managers the frequency and degree to which non-marina people have access to the facility (i.e. hotel guests, apartment/flat or condo residents co-located within a facility).

4.             Does the facility have a WORKING CCTV system, where do the images terminate, and what is the established response time in the event an incident does occur

There are a number of facilities that have cameras that do not provide effective coverage, either because the cameras are not properly oriented to the target area, or the lumen rate and pixel strength do not capture an image that is of sufficient quality for use in a forensic investigation or for introduction into evidence in criminal or civil legal proceedings.  Like all technology, CCTV systems must be periodically calibrated and maintained to ensure they remain in optimum working order, and provide optimum coverage of common areas and the entrances onto the individual piers.  It is even better if the facility’s CCTV system is activity monitored by a professional security staff that has been trained to respond to incidents in accordance with the marina’s facility security plan and associated standard operating procedures (SOPs).  A properly installed and effectively used CCTV system is an invaluable tool for use in insurance claim investigations.

5.      Is the facility actively patrolled by professional security officers? 

Many facilities will put a dockhand in a security uniform which is not the best solution.  Look for facilities that employ private security officers who understand marine operations.  There are a number of facilities that utilize professional security officers and these facilities are much more secure than facilities with no security officers.  These officers are usually trained in other areas of marine operations and can be very helpful to crews.  Professional security staff will also provide a deterrent to potential issues, especially along a public access pier.  They also have a much quicker response to the vessel over local law enforcement.  If the facility does have a professional security staff, make sure you get to know them.  Their response is usually faster if they know the caller.

6.      Where is the facility located? 

Facilities that are located within upscale neighborhoods or resort areas are usually more secure than facilities located within a non-marine area, non-regulated commercial marine facilities, or a heavy industrial area.   Upscale neighborhoods and resorts typically add another layer of access control to a facility.  Regulated facilities usually have a much better security program than non-regulated facilities as they are subject to security compliance audits by the host country’s Designated Authority.  However, that isn’t always the case.  Also, if the facility is located within a private neighborhood, make sure to ask who has access to the docks and individual slips, and what controls are in place to ensure proper access control and accountability.

7.      Is the facility well-kept and maintained? 

I am always big on attention to detail when it comes to marine facilities.  I’ve found that well-manicured and maintained facilities usually pay much better attention to security details than facilities that are not as well-maintained.  I have observed that when a number of the facility’s essential services not working, (i.e. shore power, water, pump-out, TV, etc), their security systems are usually not working properly either.

8.      What is the facility’s off-season occupancy rate? 

Facilities that provide a number of services, are well-maintained and have a strong security program are usually the toughest in which to get a slip.  Happy clients that are used to receiving the full value of effective security services will always return to a facility where they felt comfortable, secure, and received great service for the slip price.

9.      What type of insurance coverage does the facility maintain, and what value does it assign to compliance with applicable security policies and procedures, and how will it impact their coverage of your vessel in the case of vandalism, theft, or loss? 

Insurance coverage can vary around the world depending on government regulations (or lack of).  Since regulations vary so much around the world when it comes to insurance coverage, it is good practice to ensure your vessel’s insurance policy will cover loss due to theft, damage, vandalism or negligence of the facility. 

10.  To what extend is the marina able to control waterside access to its berths and guest vessels?

Control of the waterside access is one of the most important and most often over-looked security issue at many facilities.  I’ve seen a number of facilities with very good landside security, but are lacking in the quantity and quality of systems and procedures for protecting vessels, their guests and crew from unauthorized access via the waterside approaches.  There are a number of ways to secure the waterside access, but the best way to secure that access is by a waterside patrol.  Waterside patrols, staffed by trained and well-practiced personnel, will keep out undesirables and provide a very quick response if you have any problems.  Waterside patrols can also be used to provide a number of other helpful services to the facility and its clients.

Vessels should also review and revise their vessel security plan and programs at least annually, as needed, or before the vessel’s seasonal transition to a different area of operation.  A simple discrete CCTV system, access control system, and intrusion detection/alarm system can help enhance the security of the vessel, its passengers and crew in many situations.  It is also a good idea to have a basic “what-if” security plan in place to deal with the contingencies most likely to be experienced, depending upon the vessel’s itinerary, and ensure that the crew receives training and conducts periodic drills to support their effective execution should the need arise. 

It should be remembered that installing effective preventive security systems, equipment, and training personnel is ALWAYS most cost and operationally effective than remediating the financial and legal impacts resulting from a preventable security-related incident.  Security doesn’t have to be a burden or overbearing and the sky isn’t falling everywhere, but it is a good idea to understand the basics wherever you are headed to keep everybody safe.

 

SECURE WATERS SECURITY GROUP, INC TO OFFER CARGO LINES ON-DEMAND TRIP THREAT REPORTS

 The Maritime Security Council has accredited the on-demand trip threat reports 

Miami, Florida— Piracy continues to be a major problem affecting large yachts and worldwide shipping concerns.  Pirate attacks are spreading from the Gulf of Aden/Indian Ocean east to Asia and to the west coast of Africa.  There have been reports of hijackings in South and Central America, Hispaniola, and the Caribbean as well.  Shipping companies and large yacht owners are searching for solutions to help them better understand the location and type of threats they face along their routes.  Secure Waters Security Group, Inc. now provides on-demand trip threat reports to help vessels and shipping companies better understand the potential threats they may face worldwide.    

“Shipping companies can now pay for the reports they want and do not need to get locked into expensive, long term subscription based contracts.  The on-demand service provides a cost-effective solution to the large yachts, cargo vessels and shipping companies.” commented Corey D. Ranslem, chief executive officer of Secure Waters Security Group.  “We are excited that the Maritime Security Council has given their accreditation to the trip threat reporting service and will be offering this service through their website to the worldwide shipping community.”

“The Maritime Security Council, after a thorough review, is pleased to accredit the new On-demand Intelligence Report Service offered by Secure Waters Security Group,” said Philip Murray, Chairman & President of the Maritime Security Council.  “The MSC recognizes this service as an essential next step in the continuing effort to provide the maritime industry with real-time, actionable intelligence at a reasonable cost.”

Secure Waters provides a solution that will help shipping companies, cargo vessels, and large yachts understand the location of the current hot spots along their route of travel along with other pertinent regional security information.  The intelligence reports are custom tailored to address each client’s route and other specific requirements.

 Successful hijackings have increased dramatically over the past year with incidents spreading worldwide.  Ships and crews are being held in some cases for over 200 days.  The level of force used by pirates has escalated to a situation in which rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons are commonplace. Crew members are being held hostage—and in some instances killed.   

“Our main priority is to provide relevant information for the captain, owner and shipping company to make a better route decision that protects the crew, vessel and cargo,” said Ranslem.  “We can also provide additional services such as onboard security teams to enhance the vessels security protocols.”     

The reports can be provided for specific routes, ports, specific regions or general regions of the world and are available through the Maritime Security Council website, the Secure Waters website, or by telephone.  

 About Secure Waters

Secure Waters Security Group, Inc. is a multi-mission security and maritime risk and regulatory consulting firm providing clients a variety of security services to secure their facilities and vessels worldwide.  The company provides security personnel, technology, consulting expertise, and shipboard and shore-side security services to marine facilities, large yachts, cruise lines, and cargo lines worldwide.  For more information contact Secure Waters at info@securewaters.com, www.securewaters.com or call +1 786-390-0196.

 

By Corey Ranslem

Fire departments across the nation have developed many specialized response teams over the past 15-20 years to handle the complexities associated with responding to hazmat and technical rescue incidents – the latter differ from so-called “routine” operations because they usually involve very highly trained and specialized rescue teams and/or special types of equipment. Today, largely because of the tragic events of 11 September 2001, the development and use of specialized law enforcement and fire-rescue response teams is becoming commonplace even in smaller fire departments. In addition, a concentration on homeland security, and especially port security, has opened new grant funding sources for departments to receive additional training and purchase the much needed equipment required for specialized responses, particularly in the port environment.

As worldwide trade continues to grow, hazardous materials and chemicals are routinely shipped through ports around the globe. The fire departments that protect those ports require specialized training and equipment to manage many complex rescue scenarios. The U.S. government started the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) after the events of 11 September 2001 to provide additional funding for local agencies dealing with port security and response duties. The PSGP already has provided approximately $2.5 billion of grant funding for state and local agencies, as well as private industry, to improve their port security and rescue response capabilities.

“The federal port security grant program … has been a great program to help my department obtain additional equipment and training to effectively respond to incidents in the Port of Seattle,” comments Assistant Chief Alan Vickery, a 45-year veteran of the Seattle Fire Department in Washington State. “Through the PSGP, we have a level of preparedness and response we would not have without the program to better protect the residents of Seattle.” Port incident responses require a more complex set of capabilities than are needed for non-port incidents. To manage the numerous issues that must be taken into account, fire departments as well as other state and federal agencies must all respond and work together when an incident occurs at and within a port. “We train on a regular basis with law enforcement agencies and the Coast Guard on port response scenarios,” comments Captain Mike Nugent of the Fire-Rescue Department’s technical rescue team (TRT) in the Sheriff’s office of Broward County, Florida. “It is extremely important for our department to understand the response capabilities of the other neighboring agencies and the U.S. Coast Guard.” Nugent and Captain James Napp started the county’s technical rescue team almost 20 years ago, in 1992. Since the team’s inception, they have responded to thousands of TRT-related calls both in and out of the port.

High Angles, Confined Spaces & Trench Rescue Operations

The story is much the same 3,000 miles away, in the state of Washington, where the Seattle Fire Department responds to approximately 60-70 incidents per year in and around the port. That daunting workload includes at least one major shipboard fire response each year, according to Chief Vickery. “We have four fireboats that range in size from 40 feet to 125 feet, and two of those vessels have the capability to respond to CBRNE [chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosives] incidents on the water or in the port,” he commented. “We also have a technical rescue team that responds, along with our waterside assets, to specialized rescue calls in the port such as high-angle or confined-space rescues.”

Vickery and Nugent agree that frequent and effective training is key to the success of dealing with port response incidents. After firefighters are accepted for the TRT in Broward County, they attend and participate in approximately 350 hours of initial training – which is followed thereafter by 40 hours of additional monthly training. Vickery says his department has almost 1,000 firefighters trained in the basics of technical rescue operations – including the highly specialized skills required for dealing with collapse, trench-rescue, and hazmat situations. “We currently conduct quarterly drills, and yearly exercises, with the surrounding agencies, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the port businesses,” says Vickery. “It is extremely important for us to include our industry partners in these drills because they know their facilities better than we do and can help facilitate a much better response.”

Vickery himself sits on the Coast Guard’s Area Maritime Security Committee (AMSC) to help improve the close coordination needed between the Seattle Fire Department and the U.S. Coast Guard. “The Coast Guard monitors our radio system in their command center so they can respond to our calls for assistance in the port,” he said. “It is important we understand each other’s capabilities so we can provide the best response.”

Significant Challenges in Meeting “Every Possible Scenario”

Nugent’s team responded to a deadly gas leak in Port Everglades in 2008 when three port workers were killed by Argon gas in the hold of a ship. “We had immediate concerns of a hazardous environment when we first received the call, and we knew we needed to get into the hold as quickly as possible to get the workers out,” Nugent recalls. The workers had been immediately overcome by the Argon gas, however, and all three died before the would-be rescuers arrived on the scene. “When we respond to the port, there are a number of things to consider: what type of vessel, passenger or cargo; if it is cargo, what type of cargo is onboard; where on the ship is the incident; how many potential victims are there; and how do we best access the area of the incident.”

Vickery agrees with Nugent that there are a number of complexities in the port and shipboard environments that are not present in most “land-side” responses. “A ship is like a high-rise building laying on its side in the water with only a few access points,” he points out. “We face significant challenges of access when trying to get onboard a vessel. That is why it is important for us to train, on both ship design and layout, on an ongoing basis.”

The dangers associated with port responses will undoubtedly continue to increase along with the complexities of shipboard and port rescue operations. More than 90 percent of the goods and materials coming into the United States each year are carried by ships, and that level is likely to increase for many years to come. Meanwhile, cargo ships not only are growing in both size and efficiency, but also are more complex in many ways than their predecessors – and therefore will continue to challenge the resources and capabilities of local fire departments (and local Coast Guard units). “When we respond to the port,” Nugent commented, “we bring all the resources we think we might need to make sure we cover any and every possible scenario.”

 

The number of pirate attacks worldwide continues to increase.  Pirates in other areas of the world are adopting the tactics of kidnap and ransom.  Piracy now threatens the west coast of Africa near Benin and Nigeria.  Benin has attempted to reach out to the international community for help with people and resources.  Pirates are also improving their tactics and appear to be better trained in the Somalia operational region.  During August there were three reported swarm attacks in the Red Sea where pirates used 6-8 small vessels with 5-7 people in each vessel.  The attacks were not successful due to the diligence of the onboard security teams and crews, but these attacks indicate pirates are becoming much better organized and are working to hijack a vessel with a security team onboard. 

These types of swarm attacks increase the level of danger against vessels and their embarked security teams.  An analysis of the attack reports would indicate that the pirates are using these attacks at potential training missions to gauge the reaction of the ship and security teams to determine how to best defeat the tactics and hijack a ship with a security team onboard.  If a ship with an embarked security team is hijacked the ramifications on the worldwide shipping industry could be potentially devastating.    

Naval forces in the region can not keep up with the number of attacks over the wide operational area.  Ships transiting through these areas need to have plans and procedures in place to deal with the potential threat.  Ships with solid plans and security teams onboard have a much higher chance of defeating a potential pirate attack then ships with no plans or security.  Ships and shipping companies need to develop a good set of intelligence resources to understand where threats are located in real time.  Security teams need to have plans in place to deal with swarm attacks and also understand the pirates will eventually be moving attacks from daylight to night.

 

The Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) was signed into law in 2002 by then U. S. President George Bush to improve port and vessel security in the United States in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001.  The implementation of the Act and the Code of Federal Regulations promulgated from the Act started in 2004.  The MTSA made sweeping changes in U.S. maritime security that affected vessels and facilities of all sizes.  The United States Coast Guard has full responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of the regulations of the Act.  Congress also established a Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) to help public agencies and private industry determine their vulnerabilities and procure security technology to improve their facility security program. 

It is estimated that the PSGP has provided close to $2.5 billion for ports and facilities to improve their operations.  However the process for agencies and private industry to receive their funding is taking over two years once the funds are awarded.  Facilities and government agencies were required to provide matching funds of up to 25% for projects until recently where the matching requirements were removed. 

The Coast Guard along with other federal agencies have completed the initial implementation of the Transportation Worker Identification Credential or TWIC.  However they are still working to develop a standard for the electronic TWIC readers that will allow security personnel direct access to law enforcement databases and determine if the person entering the facility with the TWIC is a threat and also if the TWIC is a valid credential.  Many facilities have received grant funding for the TWIC readers, but have not purchased the readers because they are waiting for the Coast Guard approved list.

Regulations continue to become more complex for both facilities and vessels.  The Coast Guard is moving from a position of educating facilities and vessels on the regulations to enforcement of these regulations.  A number of facilities have been closed with MTSA related security issues.  Facilities should consider working with experienced MTSA consultants and security companies to help them mitigate their risk and fine/closure exposure.  There are very few security companies that can provide the security plan consulting along with the people and technology to implement the security plan.  Facilities and vessels should always check the company they hire to ensure they understand the regulations and have conducted inspections and have written plans in the past.  If a company has prior Coast Guard as part of their staff, ensure they understand the regulations, because not everyone in the Coast Guard understands or deals with MTSA.

sw godaddy © 2010 Fort Lauderdale Security Guards Security Optimization and Development by SEO Does Matter Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha