The number of pirate attacks worldwide continues to increase.  Pirates in other areas of the world are adopting the tactics of kidnap and ransom.  Piracy now threatens the west coast of Africa near Benin and Nigeria.  Benin has attempted to reach out to the international community for help with people and resources.  Pirates are also improving their tactics and appear to be better trained in the Somalia operational region.  During August there were three reported swarm attacks in the Red Sea where pirates used 6-8 small vessels with 5-7 people in each vessel.  The attacks were not successful due to the diligence of the onboard security teams and crews, but these attacks indicate pirates are becoming much better organized and are working to hijack a vessel with a security team onboard. 

These types of swarm attacks increase the level of danger against vessels and their embarked security teams.  An analysis of the attack reports would indicate that the pirates are using these attacks at potential training missions to gauge the reaction of the ship and security teams to determine how to best defeat the tactics and hijack a ship with a security team onboard.  If a ship with an embarked security team is hijacked the ramifications on the worldwide shipping industry could be potentially devastating.    

Naval forces in the region can not keep up with the number of attacks over the wide operational area.  Ships transiting through these areas need to have plans and procedures in place to deal with the potential threat.  Ships with solid plans and security teams onboard have a much higher chance of defeating a potential pirate attack then ships with no plans or security.  Ships and shipping companies need to develop a good set of intelligence resources to understand where threats are located in real time.  Security teams need to have plans in place to deal with swarm attacks and also understand the pirates will eventually be moving attacks from daylight to night.

 

The Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) was signed into law in 2002 by then U. S. President George Bush to improve port and vessel security in the United States in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001.  The implementation of the Act and the Code of Federal Regulations promulgated from the Act started in 2004.  The MTSA made sweeping changes in U.S. maritime security that affected vessels and facilities of all sizes.  The United States Coast Guard has full responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of the regulations of the Act.  Congress also established a Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) to help public agencies and private industry determine their vulnerabilities and procure security technology to improve their facility security program. 

It is estimated that the PSGP has provided close to $2.5 billion for ports and facilities to improve their operations.  However the process for agencies and private industry to receive their funding is taking over two years once the funds are awarded.  Facilities and government agencies were required to provide matching funds of up to 25% for projects until recently where the matching requirements were removed. 

The Coast Guard along with other federal agencies have completed the initial implementation of the Transportation Worker Identification Credential or TWIC.  However they are still working to develop a standard for the electronic TWIC readers that will allow security personnel direct access to law enforcement databases and determine if the person entering the facility with the TWIC is a threat and also if the TWIC is a valid credential.  Many facilities have received grant funding for the TWIC readers, but have not purchased the readers because they are waiting for the Coast Guard approved list.

Regulations continue to become more complex for both facilities and vessels.  The Coast Guard is moving from a position of educating facilities and vessels on the regulations to enforcement of these regulations.  A number of facilities have been closed with MTSA related security issues.  Facilities should consider working with experienced MTSA consultants and security companies to help them mitigate their risk and fine/closure exposure.  There are very few security companies that can provide the security plan consulting along with the people and technology to implement the security plan.  Facilities and vessels should always check the company they hire to ensure they understand the regulations and have conducted inspections and have written plans in the past.  If a company has prior Coast Guard as part of their staff, ensure they understand the regulations, because not everyone in the Coast Guard understands or deals with MTSA.

 

Pirates are continuing to improve their tactics and expand their areas of operation.  Piracy in the Indian Ocean region extends from the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden south to the Seychelles Islands and East to India.  Pirate attacks are continuing to increase off the west Coast of Africa neat Benin and Nigeria and the number of attacks continues to rise in the South China Sea.  Pirates have attempted to attack every type of ship from sailing vessels to large yachts to cargo and cruise ships.  Pirate tactics are also changing.  Recently pirates tried a swan attack on a cargo vessel using 12 small boats with 5-8 people in each small boat.  The attack was unsuccessful but now demonstrates a new sophistication in tactics along with a new level of coordination between potential pirate organizational groups.  Pirates have not yet been successful in hijacking a cruise ship.  There have been a couple reported attacks against cruise ships. The M/S Nautica was the near victim of an attempted attack in the Gulf of Aden near Kenya. The only reason the ship was not hijacked by pirates was because the captain was able to outrun the pirate’s speed boats.  Pirates also attempted to hijack the cruise ship Seaborne Spirit on November 5th, 2005.  The Spirit used a sound device that repelled the pirate attack.  Cruise ships typically are not good targets because of their higher transit speeds and limited boarding locations. 

Professional maritime security companies provide vessels of all types with an added layer of defense against pirate attacks and other unwanted boardings and are a must when transiting piracy prone areas worldwide.  There was a successful attack and hijacking reported against a vessel with a security team onboard.  However the security team was unarmed and was unable to protect the vessel from the attack.  If mariners plan to bring security onboard to protect the vessel, you are wasting your money and putting your crew in greater danger if you use an unarmed team.

There are numerous companies worldwide that profess expertise in maritime security, but do not have any background or experience in the industry.  When searching for a maritime security company, research their background and experience in the maritime security and law enforcement (public or private) and their shipboard procedures for their team members and the ship’s crew.  Also obtain a profile of each team member who will be coming onboard your vessel so you understand the background of who is protecting your ship.  Most experienced companies will have profiles on all of their personnel plus a basic standard operating procedure for both their personnel and the ship’s crew.  An experienced company will be an asset while an inexperienced security company will be a liability to your vessel and crew.

 

By Corey D. Ranslem*

Although pirates have been plying the world’s oceans since the early days of shipping, modernday piracy is much more than the long-told tale of old when a pirate ship pulls alongsideanother vessel, enabling a few one-legged pirates with eye patches to swing onboard in aneffort to pilfer money or goods. Today, piracy is better understood as a growing and violentinternational crime that jeopardizes the shared economic security of all nations. And piratesare better understood as members of organized criminal gangs with international backingthrough rogue states, organized crime groups, and terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda –criminal elements with proven interests in harming America’s national security.

There are other differences as well. Many pirate ships today still manage to sneak up on victimships that did not see them coming, but they do it armed with RPGs and AK-47s. Today, theynot only steal goods, but they hold the crew, contents, and vessel ransom for millions of dollars(the last ransom paid to pirates was estimated to be close to $12 million USD). The most activearea for piracy is a region of operation extending from East Africa to India and south pastthe Seychelles Islands including the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, and the Indian ocean (an area ofoperation almost as large as the continental U.S). While pirates still conduct random boardings,they also target ships for the best possible financial return – such as a Ukrainian ship capturedwith a cargo of weapons and Soviet-era tanks bound for south Sudan.

Our interconnected global economy is built on the ability to safely and efficiently transportgoods and products around the world – the loss of that capability endangers the economicwelfare of all countries. Worldwide shipping and economic experts believe that piracy isnow costing the world economy at least $12 billion (greater than the GDP of more than 66countries). But the true cost could far exceed that estimate. When pirates captured a Saudisupertanker loaded with two million barrels of crude oil, the value of oil went up a wholedollar in a few hours. Although a large proportion of the world’s petroleum passes through thepirate-infested Gulf of Aden, some companies have ordered oil tankers to sail the entire wayaround Africa to avoid the risk, despite the increased cost and time. Other shipping companiessail through risky areas, but do not report hijackings and ransoms paid for reputational andinsurance rate purposes. As this problem continues to grow, so too will the harm to the world’sshared economic security.

In addition to economic security, piracy across the globe endangers national security at home.Today, it is not uncommon to find pirates with a political agenda and ties to terrorist groups.Facing frozen funding across the globe, Islamic terrorists (including various al Qaeda affiliates) have concluded piracy provides a strong funding stream as well as the ability to impede globaltransport routes of many goods and products – particularly the supply of oil and gas. Not onlyhave attacks been made on U.S. vessels, such as the USS Cole and the Maersk Alabama, butal Qaeda continues to attempt acts of terrorism here at home – such as the Christmas Daybombing of a Northwest flight headed for Detroit in 2009, thwarted by passengers tackling theterrorist before he detonated the bomb inside his clothes. Planning of this attack was linked toal Qaeda affiliates in the Arabian Peninsula and Yemen. Other pirates have formed organized crime syndicates and found backing by rogue states – other entities which pose grave danger to our national security.

Conferences, trade-shows, and piracy-related programs are popping up all over the world.New “expert” companies are entering the market space weekly with the newest protectivetechnology, chemical agents, or protective plan to repel pirate attacks. Some work and othersare dismal failures. The maritime security industry continues to put a band-aide on a severedlimb. Experts and government officials meet regularly to determine how best to mitigate thethreat of piracy but avoid the 800 pound gorilla in the room…the complete political instabilityand lawlessness in Somalia and surrounding countries. Until this issue is addressed and solved,piracy will continue to escalate regardless of the measures taken by shipping companies,governments, and private security contractors.

The approach to solving the piracy problem is going to involve worldwide public and privateresources including military, law enforcement, and private security experts. One obvious, butundesirable, solution is to stop paying the ransoms. However, this would initially cause majorloss of life for crew members, not to mention the loss of extremely expensive ships and cargo.Ultimately, this would cause complete chaos in the shipping industry.
Inserting naval forces has not worked because the naval forces have not been used properly.Currently naval forces conduct patrols and provide escorts to ships through this region.However, pirate attacks and successful hijackings continue to rise. Governments have notused naval assets to blockade the Somali coast (naval blockades have been successful in pastconflicts). The successful defeat of piracy will involve a coordinated effort between naval forcesand ground forces along with the cooperation of national and international law enforcement agencies.

Governments and international law enforcement organizations need to freeze bank accountsassociated with pirate support organizations and rogue states. They must issue legal andfinancial sanctions against groups and organizations whose support of ongoing pirateenterprises can be documented. Pirates who are captured must be prosecuted despite thelegal challenges and burdens that imposes. Efforts must be increased to deal harshly with rogue states who support or turn a blind eye to piracy including international economicsanctions.

Shipping and insurance companies must work with reputable security companies to developand implement policies, plans and procedures for dealing effectively with piracy. Thereare many ships that successfully avoid hijacking by developing, training, and implementingstrong counter-piracy plans, while actively maintaining a good sense of maritime domain andsituational awareness. It seems obvious, but many fail to do this. During the transit of highpiracy areas, all available crew members should be stationed as look-outs and be supplementedby technology-based detection systems. Additional contract security personnel should beconsidered to supplement crews of vessels carrying high value cargo, or those ships thatare very slow moving or unable to readily alter course. All vessels need to be in constantcommunication with the nearest naval assets and other coordinating authorities. Threatintelligence is essential as well. Shipping companies that put these measures in place have amuch lower chance of being hijacked.

By working together to form a well-planned, layered security and military approach, theworldwide epidemic of piracy can be effectively mitigated and our global economy and national security can be protected.

*Corey Ranslem is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Secure Waters Security Group, Inc. anda recognized maritime security expert. Mr. Ranslem has worked in the public and private sectorof maritime security for the past 16 years (eight of those years in the U.S. Coast Guard), focusingon worldwide port and maritime security. For more information please contact Secure WatersSecurity Group, INC, www.securewaters.com or +1 786 390 0196.

 

Fighting Piracy in the Gulf of Aden and Beyond
By James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.,
Richard Weitz, Ph.D.,
and Martin Edwin Andersen

Please click here to read the entire article

Members of The Heritage Foundation’s Maritime Security Working Group
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., The Heritage Foundation
Jim Dolbow, Contributor, An Unofficial Coast Guard Blog
Mackenzie M. Eaglen, The Heritage Foundation
Shelly Gardiner, U.S. Coast Guard (Consultant)
Mark Gaspar, Director, Maritime Systems, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Daniel Gouré, Vice President, The Lexington Institute
James D. Hull, Independent Consultant
Michael W. Kichman, U.S. Coast Guard (Consultant)
Robbin F. Laird, Ph.D., Gryphon Technologies
Kevin R. McCarthy, Catalyst Partners
Jena Baker McNeill, The Heritage Foundation
David Olive, Olive, Edwards, & Cooper LLC
James Phillips, The Heritage Foundation
Rob Quartel, FreightDesk Technologies
Corey D. Ranslem, Secure Waters LLC
Luke Ritter, Ridge Global LLC
Jeffrey C. Robertson, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Brett D. Schaefer, The Heritage Foundation
Irvin Varkonyi, George Mason University

sw godaddy © 2010 Fort Lauderdale Security Guards Security Optimization and Development by SEO Does Matter Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha